Congratulations to the Research ShowCASE and Intersections Presentation Winners
Postdoctoral First Place Winners:
Postdoctoral Honorable Mention:
Graduate Student First Place Winners:
Graduate Student Honorable Mention:
Jang Ik Cho
Seyed Mohsen Seifi
Undergraduate First Place Winners:
Taylor Nguyen (Mentor - Mohan Sankaran)
Elishama Kanu (Mentor - Hillel Chiel)
Anisha Garg (Mentor - Barbara Kuemerle)
Raghav Tripathi (Mentor - Jeremy Bordeaux)
Diana Acosta (Mentor - Roger French)
Margaret Mack (Mentor - Zheng-Rong Lu)
Moriah Watts (Mentor - Marilyn Lotas)
William Qu (Mentor - Paul Tesar)
Logan Smith (Mentor - Julia Dobosotskaya)
Harini Ushasri and Liana Manuel (Mentor - John Paul Stephens)
Alayna Klco (Mentor - Katia Almeida)
Undergraduate Second Place Winners:
Paul Advincula (Mentor - Rigoberto Advincula)
Samantha Butler (Mentor - Chung-Chiun Liu)
Sara Mithani (Mentor - Leena Palomo)
Rachael Wieber and Breanon Glover (Mentor - Mary Quinn Griffin)
Arvind Haran (Mentor - Michael Jenkins)
Elishama Kanu (Mentor - Hillel Chiel)
Katie Pezzot (Mentor - Jiayang Sun)
Samir Shah (Mentors: Matthew Williams and Robert Kirsch)
Kathy Lin (Mentor - Amy Przeworski)
Lauren Pohl (Mentor - Amy Przeworski)
Lisa Richey (Mentor - Kathryn Rothenberg)
Supported by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation, the Imagination Institute a non-profit organization based in Pennsylvania dedicated to advancing the understanding of and research on imagination, has established under its initiative, Advancing the Science of Imagination: Toward an “Imagination Quotient,” a grants competition targeted to psychologists, neuroscientists, and educators who conduct research on theory of mind, mental imagery, mental simulation, perspective taking, prospective thought, daydreaming, mind wandering, counterfactual thinking, creativity, memory, curiosity, child development, aging, social cognition, and related fields, to support projects that seek to test and validate a proposed measure and develop an intervention for imagination/perspective. This initiative encourages such researchers to collaborate with individuals in corporate, military, school, health, university, governmental, and artistic settings to demonstrate that the proposed measure and interventions work in such a setting. Proposals from around the world will be welcomed.
In 2015, up to fifteen (15), two-year grants in the range of $150,000 to $200,000 will be awarded to scholars from around the world. The awards are intended to generate new scientific information in order to further clarify the construct of imagination and its measurement for the purpose of advancing an understanding of the human mind and its role in the optimization of human potential and flourishing. The award recipients will be brought together for a retreat at the conclusion of the program in the summer of 2017 in order to compare the results of their projects and to discuss longer-term efforts at generating an “Imagination Quotient”.
Application Deadline: September 30, 2015
For more information visit the Imagination Institute website.
Purchasing Computing Devices with Federal Funds under the New Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Parts 200.20 and 200.453)
Computing devices are machines used to acquire, store, analyze, process, and publish data and other information electronically and include accessories (or peripherals) for printing, transmitting and receiving, or storing electronic information. Computing devices costing less than $5,000 are not considered equipment and therefore are treated as supplies and materials. Therefore, if a computing device is to be acquired for use in the performance of a federal award, the computing device may be charged to the federal award provided that:
Determining whether a computing device is essential – The Principal Investigator should consider (and document) whether performing the work under the award without the computing device would be difficult and inefficient. An important measure of this is determining (and documenting) whether the anticipated cost of performing the work without the computing device is greater than the combined cost of performing the work plus the cost of acquiring the computing device.
- it is essential (i.e., necessary) to performing the work under the award, and
- the cost is allocable and reasonable.
Determining whether a computing device is allocable to a federal award – If a computing device is essential to and will benefit a federal award, it is allocable to that award. The cost may be allocated to a federal award even when its usage is not solely dedicated to it. However, the Principal Investigator should first consider the amount of benefit of the computing device to the project, and the cost should be allocated proportionally with a reasonable cost allocation methodology.
Determining whether the cost of a computing device is reasonable – The Principal Investigator must make an informed, prudent decision, taking into consideration not only the cost, but the utility, quality and value of the device to the project.
If a computing device is not essential to a federal award, it is not allocable (in whole or in part) as a direct cost to that award. In such cases, the computing device is considered to be a “general use” item and must be treated as an indirect cost expense (just like paper, pens and other general use supplies), and charged to an appropriate institutional funding source.
Please remember that all expenses charged to federal awards must conform to the cost principles specified in the OMB Uniform Guidance. Please consult with the Office of Research Administration if you should have any questions about whether you may charge a specific expense to federal funds.
Good Clinical Practice (GCP) Certification
Tuesday, June 2, 2015
8:00AM – 11:30 AM
Wolstein Research Building Auditorium, Room 1413
8:00 – 10:00 AM- GCP and PI Responsibilities:
This session will include discussions of the relationships between laws, regulations, guidelines, and standard operating procedures. Key obligations of sponsors, monitors and investigators and their inter-relationships will be described. Investigators completing the program will receive a GCP certificate that can be provided to sponsors.
10:15 - 11:30 AM- Ethical Considerations, Informed Consent and Financial Disclosure:
This session will include a brief historical perspective of ethical considerations in conducting clinical research. The elements and process for obtaining informed consent from potential study participants will be discussed and well as financial disclosure.
Registration is online at: http://research.case.edu/Education/OnlineCalendar.cfm.
National Science Foundation (NSF) & American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS)
The U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) and the American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS) have launched the Beyond the Box National Digitization Innovation Competition. The initiative will award $1 million to the individual or team who develops a novel way to accurately and efficiently capture digital images of insect specimens and their associated data from a standard museum drawer of insects.
The Beyond the Box Digitization Challenge has been designed to stimulate individuals or teams to solve a problem that is hindering scientific research and innovation - the inability to quickly and accurately digitize specimens and associated data in a standard tray of insects in a natural history museum. Solving this problem will help advance research as well as contribute to improved public health, environmental management, and agriculture by providing scientists, farmers, health care providers, and citizen scientists with access to our nation's insect collections. Moreover, the solution to this problem will almost certainly find additional applications in scientific and commercial settings.
The winning entry will receive up to $1 million for the development of a hardware and software system that automates digitization of pinned insect specimens, without damaging the specimens--one of the most challenging biocollections digitization tasks.
Visit the Beyond the Box website for more information on the challenge.
If you have news or information that you wish to have included in this
update, please send it via e-mail to Tracy Wilson-Holden at
firstname.lastname@example.org no later than
5 pm on the Monday of the week that the update is to be distributed. If you
know of individuals who may be interested in receiving this update, please forward this e-mail to them. To subscribe or unsubscribe
to Case Research News, email your request to Tora Williams at
Please note: At the time of this transmission, all links functioned.
However, Case Research News cannot guarantee that the information will not move or be